9/12/2006

Chie Fueki

28 comments:

  1. Chie Fueki @
    Mary Boone
    541 W 24
    New York, NY 10011

    ReplyDelete
  2. One of the great reasons to get into the arts in the first place is so you can ignore football and all that stupidity. Not for me...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I dont know what the football player represents but the last show I saw had birds and stuff. THey were smaller, and it was in a smaller gallery, so I guess they weren't worth as much, but I think they were better.

    welcome to the floating world

    Is Chie Fueki a football fan? My guess is that its more a bridging of the cultures sort of thing. Multicultural stuff.

    One last thing - Im not a fan of pattern and decoration even though I like patterns. Its a trap I dont want to get into. What if all you really do is design paisley patterns?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tan.Hibiscus. Cannabus.
    Hawaii? Haowlie. Sun Tan.
    Ganguro.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This looks like something that would hang in a pipe shop in the Haight-Ashbury.

    ReplyDelete
  6. thats not nice.....

    Would these same criticisms go for Tomaselli as well?

    ReplyDelete
  7. devinlevin said...
    This post has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes, Tomaselli is not immune. He has assistants so no "obsessive" credit like Yayoi kusama or a tibetan/hopi mandala painter. I mena obsessive just doesnt cut it - otherwise every stoner with a trip book would be on the market right?
    Thou shall shit it out.

    Calvinism.
    Hedonism.

    I said it once, Ill say it again
    I like the quilts
    of gees bend.

    here is a cool quilt.

    In some countries of Europe and in Japan, chrysanthemums are symbolic of death and are only used for funerals or on graves. In the United States, the flower is usually seen as more positive and cheerful.

    subversive

    ReplyDelete
  9. Arts and Crafts movement was in large part a reaction to industrialization, if looked at on the whole, it was neither anti-industrial nor anti-modern. Some of the European factions believed that machines were in fact necessary, but they should only be used to relieve the tedium of mundane, repetitive tasks.

    arts and crafts

    is it time?

    ReplyDelete
  10. worth seeing in person, there beady ground is highly labor intensive. nice david salle in the back room.

    ReplyDelete
  11. She celebrates muscled man... and girlifies [sp?] him......

    ReplyDelete
  12. More from the 'teachings of matthew barney' not all muscle men but sports if i recall correctly.

    heh thx painter considering my approch to the Artworld the "sneaky" shot is spot on. - flattered ;)

    ReplyDelete
  13. ooops my bad, should read

    " Is Chinese art a hot growth area in a superheated art market?"

    ReplyDelete
  14. KJ good point about the cultural/ history aspect.
    As he's outside the box... maybe he's a gift [wrapping paper patterns et al].
    Bodybuilding's not my thing , so I go with "denigration".

    ReplyDelete
  15. I always felt like P&D was some marketing strategy by Holly Solomon. An excuse for some loud paintings? Didnt seem significant at all.

    Miriam SHapiro to James Gobel...that's important work.

    ReplyDelete
  16. »Just as water, gas, and electricity are brought into our houses from far off to satisfy our needs in response to a minimal effort, so we shall be supplied with cultural commodities, which will appear and disappear at a simple movement of the hand, hardly more than a sign.«

    -Steve Jobs

    ReplyDelete
  17. "I felt that by making a large canvas magnificent in color, design, and proportion, filling it with fabrics and quilt blocks, I could raise a housewife's lowered consciousness."

    -Martha Stewart

    ReplyDelete
  18. Decinlevin. THanks for your interest. Please say something interesting. Otherwise here are a few suggested topics:



    1) Is pattern and decoration rigourous?

    2) Chevrons- like or dislike?

    4) What do the Opium Wars have to do with anything?

    5) Does Japan have influences or is she visionary?

    ReplyDelete
  19. forget topics. I'm tellin yall now.
    INVEST in China if you have the money.
    Japanese art or no japanese art.
    Your children will thank you for it.

    ReplyDelete
  20. peggie--we are all investing in china, whether we want to or not

    ReplyDelete
  21. Closeuup, don't know how to take that,
    but for those of you who want not...

    You can blame our american finacial complex
    for that -- a debt-centric institution that values
    speculative investment more than it values
    the production and circulation of real goods.

    Funny how art mirrors real life.

    We are beyond the point, closeuup, of
    returning to the time when our production
    was greater-to-or-equal-to our debt-spending.
    I'm cynical in this view, yes.

    In order to get out:
    1) Less speculation
    2) More institutional value on sweat-equity.

    I think this should (or will)
    be reflected in our art market
    once we realize that our production capacity
    (thought as well as material) has been diminished
    by the shadow of speculation and it's methodologies.
    In essence, we tend to invest on things that
    have not been produced yet. We build confidence
    in innovation, yet we relegate the physical infrastructures
    that can test and build upon ideas to the 3rd world.
    Those infrastructures are the key to innovation.
    American industry has, in effect, 'forgotton' how
    to build and test things cuz the builders and testers
    have long been farmed out oversesas.

    The masters money may be here (um...really?)
    but the masters tools are elsewhere.

    Finance -- the financial institution -- with its
    speculative values -- is the American Emporer
    who will one day have no clothes.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Postscript:
    Investing is fine -- I can do that.
    But investing in Investing is a recipe for a logical crash.

    But please, beefore investing overseas, pay back all your
    credit card debt, pllleze, as a gesture of
    defiance toward your emporer.

    ReplyDelete
  23. saw this in person, was really astounding up close....
    Im still not 100% with the subjects and from far away something becomes too static, perhaps in the composition but all in all nice show

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.